March 5, 2014

Is Geography Susceptible to Change?

                As the common saying goes, change is the only permanent entity in this world. Hence, we should see change with outmost vigour and attention since it only marks room for improvements, and as Geography itself is a discipline as what the paper suggested, it should be open to new and innovative ideas and processes that has the capacity to further develop it.
                The controversy I was very interested at was the “Generational gap” issue that was stated in the reading material, the way I see it, veteran geographers fail to comprehend and appreciate new and fresh concepts being presented by new geographers. I think one way to make a successful linkage between the “old” and the “new” is through a uniform medium of communication, in other words, a functional language, since we all communicate through the use of language, I do think that if only the two parties can effectively exchange ideas through a well versed language, the problem will be diminished, if not eradicated.
         I think now that we have the greater capacity to understand the still unrealizable concepts of Geography, we have focused too much on the sub-disciplines and even further dividing them to more contemporaries, we have overlooked the whole picture and instead, focused on the individual and categorized parts of it, it has been mentioned on the article that geographers have been interested in categorizing the ideas we currently have in Geography into more defined constituents. The problem is manifested by the time these constituents will try to stabilize themselves and then they find out that there already is a subject field very well related to it, like Geomorphologists with Geologists, and Economic Geographers with Economists, and then a shaky solution would be to further glue itself within the realms of Geography, which I think is appropriate but not concrete.
                Lastly, I think one way of limiting the chaotic nature of the definition of Geography is by admitting that there is indeed no definition that can exactly and totally satisfy the ideas of all the esteemed geographers have combined, each will have their own opinion on what should be included and what should be crashed-out, but through a convention of a general thought, not necessarily going to the specifics, we can all free ourselves from endless debates and argumentations.

No comments:

Post a Comment